MORE WHATNOT

Levelogger Don Pendleton (and P-Rod) done did the Dew. CN260710

What do you call a smart car with a 1000cc superbike engine? Insane. And available. CN200710

Niels “Shoe” Meulman grafs seriously old-school. CN160710

Maybe adidas should have recut the whole thing instead of Lucas. Nicely done. CN050610

A printer, made from Lego! And felt tips! MN020610

When TV was for kids and not merchandising. CN260510 [1]

Stories from the merch table. MN190510

Some cool work. He’s got a show coming up in SF at Gallery Heist. OA040510

031

Nick Murphy writer

28 July 2010

designtransport

Wheelie Good*

Emer is a BMX clothing brand that I remember from the 90s. I would occasionally see an Emer-clad Phil Dolan in his world-beating days or maybe spot the infamous Igo brothers sporting Emer during their reign of carnage. Turns out Level contributor—and man behind Emer—Johann Chan is firing up some new Emer products again.

There are a couple of nice t-shirts and, more interestingly, a prototype for a new bike, the very agile and tight-looking Emer Swift: “The Swift is designed with modern BMX geometry so it retains the same riding position as a modern BMX, but runs high-set gearing and big skinny wheels for greater speed,” says Johann. “It’s still nimble enough to ride as a BMX, and it’s also quick.” The Swift boasts a very tight back end for a cruiser, making it more manual-friendly than other cruisers. The striking graphics were designed by top type designer Seb Lester [see Goodstuff 009], who also has a background in BMX. (This is proven in his profile on the Emer site, which includes an excellent picture of him performing a backwards rubber ride.)

Johann breaks it down for us: “It’s a cruiser for people who want to beat fixies to the pub.”

reviews

LATEST: 15 July 2010

reviews

LATEST: 23 July 2010

reviews

LATEST: 19 April 2010

glimpses

LATEST: 27 July 2009

film

Where the Wild Things Are

Anyone who puts this film down has forgotten the feelings and emotions they had as a kid and doesn’t have kids of their own or do but have never paid attention to their feelings and emotions. Ah, it’s a sweeping statement, but why anyone wouldn’t be taken by this film is otherwise beyond me: at 101 minutes, it’s a startlingly faithful adaptation of a book that, adapted literally, would likely run shorter than the ad breaks during an episode of The Simpsons.

People who say it’s boring have probably watched too much Jackass for their own good, as the film is paced perfectly for each scene’s mood and there’s not a scene that could be cut without detriment to the story. Anyone who says it’s scary for kids listens to too much negative Hollywood hype. (My five-year-old loved it.)

If you watch it with an open heart, you cannot fail to be enchanted. Genius.

Chris Noble, 07 November 2009

SHARE: FB TW IN SU